Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

"Enhanced" Star Diagonals


Recommended Posts

I'm window shopping  with view to eventually acquiring a 2" star diagonal for a achromaric refractor. After the usual trawl through on-line articles and posts I had pretty much come to the conclusion that paying the extra for a dielectric was probably the way to go. Then I came across a couple of "enhanced" diagonals that gave 94-95% reflectivity. A little further digging to gain information on what "enhanced" meant brought up this short article by Gary Hand.

http://www.cloudynights.com/page/articles/cat/articles/optical-theory/diagonals-prisms-vs-mirrors-r79

Dielectric certainly seems to win the day in terms of durability but I'm now left wondering whether the difference between 95% and 99% reflectivity is worth thinking  about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an enhanced diagonal by Tele Vue. I can't see any difference in use between it and the Tele Vue dielectric that I also have. The dielectric coatings are reputed to be harder wearing than other coating types. I guess I prefer the dielectric on the basis "every little helps" but I'm possibly kidding myself :smiley:

I have used prism diagonals but not the premium units so I can't really comment on those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John, I am getting the feeling that as long as I go with something of known quality in terms of sound construction and optics, I should be OK, at least for my purposes. in that sense it could be that it will wind up being a dielectric anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John, I am getting the feeling that as long as I go with something of known quality in terms of sound construction and optics, I should be OK, at least for my purposes. in that sense it could be that it will wind up being a dielectric anyway.

That sounds a sensible approach. You don't see too many enhanced diagonals for sale. Mostly they seem to go from "regular" to dielectic with nothing in between. The dielectric ones are quite reasonable now so there is no reason not to get one really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some considerations:

The gain from 99% over a 95% reflectivity is 0.045 magnitudes.

Enhanced aluminium slowly degrades and needs to be cleaned carefully.

A prism has three surfaces that need to be at the proper angles to each other (that's difficult!) as well as completely flat and super smooth.

Micro bubbles inside a prism will scatter light, other irregularities will do the same.

Micro scratches on a mirror will scatter light.

The light cone from a star hits only a fraction of the surface of a diagonal (the beam is already quite narrow there), which means that a 1/10th wave surface functions easily as well as a fully illuminated 1/40th wave surface.

The many layers of coatings on a dielectric mirror give the reflective surface a turned edge, like snow on a roof. A dielectric mirror needs to be oversized by a few mm  for that reason. Relatively, that's a little bit for a 2" mirror, and of course a bit more for a 1.25".

Bottom line:  I replaced a 20y old TV enhanced aluminium diagonal with a WO dielectric one and can't see any difference. In spite of the turned edges I also got two 1.25" dielectric diagonals which seem to work perfectly fine. Dielectric is nice mostly for cleaning: you don't have to worry that you'll dull the surface over time. Diagonals tend to gather dust and do require regular cleaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I Agree with  the comments here on coatings , I have never really seen a difference between diagonals and more than once we have done blind testing of some 2 inch diagonals , AP ;s , TV's , WO's , SW's  of dielectric and aluminium coatings and to be honest we could never pick a winner , its more about build quality , status , and telescope quality and seeing conditions .

Any mid range dielectric one will be fine .

Brian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.