Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Getting colour from the moon?


Recommended Posts

This is yesterday's APOD:

STACKED-COLOUR-ISS-ODonnell1024.jpg

When I saw it, I suddenly realised that the 'colour artefacts' I saw on my own moon picture weren't artefacts at all. Less pronounced, but only visible at 50% zoom, they mimic the distribution of colours (brown/cyan) in the above picture.

But for some reason I can only see them at 50% zoom, the picture goes grey when zoomed in or out! resampling teh picture makes it grey too, but a screen grab shows the effect:

Colour moon

(Sadly no ISS included)

Clearly it's something to do with debayering of the CRW files and what PIPP does to the image. But obviously using a screen garb and 50% resolution is losing a lot of precious data! How should I debayer in PIPP to be able to process these colours properly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All you need is an RGB (ie colour) image and some software that will boost the colour saturation.  Photoshop or GIMP will do it.

This is one from 2011 - the processing is a bit rough but it shows what you can do with a DSLR and full frame shot:

post-4502-0-03518700-1438442203_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they aren't converting to mono. If I pump up the saturation the moon turns orange! The same happens to RAW images converted to TIFF by Raw Therapee.

But if I take the stacked image, zoom to 50%, I get the effect above  which is clearly NOT an artefact as the colours are in the same places as the APOD pic :-/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I see how it can be PIPP.  The colour information must still be there even if you can only see it at one image size.  There are lots of different debayering algorithms, but they don't tend to affect the colours that much (though they will do fractionally as they give surrounding pixels slightly different weights when calculating the final colour of any specific pixel).  They tend to be more targeted towards getting better representations of hard edges and reduction of artefacts due to the fact that the image is made of square pixels.

The fact that you can see it at some resolutions and not others could perhaps be an artefact of the rescaling process?  Maybe at full size your eye isn't sufficiently sensitive to perceive it whereas at 50% there's sufficient density of colour to pick it up and then as you go smaller still too much information is being thrown away and you lose it again?

There are some tutorials about processing the Moon to give colour somewhere online.  It could be worth trying that with the full size image to see if it's possible to pull any colour out?

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it worth trying on a single frame without any other processing?  It may not be the debayering, but it might be some other part of the process.  Going through everything one step at a time might reveal the cause.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.