Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yes, I really like star clusters and enjoy "hunting" for the ones that books etc. tell me I should be able to see. Occasionally, whilst just scanning the skies with binos I''ll happen upon a fuzzy object which will sometimes prove to be a Messier cluster. However, as Steve has said, if you are referring to "proper" hunting for the less well known/unknown clusters that need 8" +, I'm not there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is messier marathon

The messier objects are a list of 110 targets discovered by charles messier. they are usually known by their number prefixed with an "M". for instance orion nebula is M42 etc. if you have not downloaded stellerium (free) I suggest you do....you can find loads of interesting targets in there :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For an open cluster like the Pleiades (M45) 10x50 binos give good views, other tighter clusters are good through my 20x60s, but the best view I've had of M37, for instance, is through my Tal1. Globular clusters though visible through binos, unless you are talking big binos, are better through a scope to begin to show some detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Jumping in...sorry Alfian :)) 15x70 are not the biggest bins made, but they're at the very limit of what can be hand-held - but will greatly benefit from mounting (monopod or tripod). The Celestron ones you have are pretty light - my Quantum 4 weigh a ton in comparison. Clusters like the Beehive (Messier 44) will look very nice in 15s. But as Alfian said, get a scope on them with a  nice widefield ep and you can see loads more stars...

I'm fairly taken with asterisms ( 'accidental' star patterns that form a shape) as well - such as the Coathanger (good in bins) & Cheshire Cat (need a scope - in my lp skies at least).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know the Hama tripod, what is its maximum load?

Although...the Celestrons are light enough - but you may find the slightest breeze may make them jiggle if your tripod/head is not too solid. Without knowing your 'pod, I would have thought it would be OK (ish) - at least better than hand-holding for long periods.

Double stars are exactly that! Check out Albireo on Stellarium ( the most famous double I guess, although the Double-Double in Lyra, and Castor are as well known). Clusters are usually a whole mess of stars, usually very pretty :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edited in above you!

:)

And just a thought - clusters can be Globular (circular accretions, a real doggone star-fest going on) or Open - loose gatherings making up a group. M13 in Hercules is a Glob, M44 is Open. Fun eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best is open to personal interpretation.

The easy ones to see are M44 in Cancer, the Double Cluster in Perseus, M13 in Hercules etc. Also depends on your skies! I find M38 in Auriga (one end of the Cheshire Cats' smile) a real pain to make out sometimes...others see it at the drop of the old proverbial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is m44 I seen globular very pretty

In Cancer. Just to the left of Castor and Pollux (Gemini). The Beehive sure is a cutie :)

Edit\ It's all about sky conditions for me - London skies (my bit of it anyways) are not too conducive to clear seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.