hjw Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Recent posts by mike005 triggered me to put more effort into processing. So yesterday I spend the whole evening tweaking a picture of the Carina Nebula. I learned a lot about DSS (for example don't tick "superpixels" if you want full resolution ) and even more about PS, which I am still not familiar with. Spend some time uploading the full resolution image to my gallery here only to find out that it is resized anyway. Anyway, I would like to share my efforts and encourage all comments on what I could improve.I uploaded the much larger (16x) full resolution picture to astrobin:http://www.astrobin.com/full/175476/0/CheersHJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeODay Posted April 25, 2015 Share Posted April 25, 2015 Wonderful widefield image HJ. I like the colours and you have heaps of detail in the nebula.I also love the star field in your larger image on astrobin - the more one zooms in the more faint and colourful stars one finds.I'm still quite new to astrophotography but I think you might still have more 'information' hiding in your image. I have struggled over time with Photoshop to really strongly stretch the shadows in an image without destroying it with noise. I recently downloaded the free 60day trial version of PixInsight and I've been playing around with it's Masked Stretch process that seems to a do good job. You could download it and give it a go. If you do, the online tutorials you will find with a google search will definately help with the relatively steep initial learning curve.CheersMike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjw Posted April 26, 2015 Author Share Posted April 26, 2015 ...I think you might still have more 'information' hiding in your image...CheersMikeHi Mike,there is nothing like a good challenge . I have tried Pixinsight (and any other software in my disposal) to enhance the faint outer regions of the nebula. However, I am not sure which version I prefer. The first version in this post is more "balanced" for lack of a better description while the second obviously shows more of the nebula. As always, any comments are welcome!CheersHJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeODay Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 I like both but I agree the first one looks more natural. What does it look like if you blend the two together with 50% weighting? CheersMike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.