Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Knocked out by first time with a larger scope


Recommended Posts

I picked up a second hand Skywatcher 150PL last Saturday. Last night I got fed up waiting for good conditions - I coudl only spend so much time on collimating and adjusting the gears etc.

I got an hour outside, although there was a very obvious thin layer of haze above scattered cloud. There was also enough wind to shake the scope!

A good omen was that I just plonked down the scope oriented to what I thought is north and Polaris was nicely in the centre of the mount.

The moon was stunning. The central peak in Tycho actually looked likea little cone, not a dot. Along the terminator the detail was incredible compared to my '76mm cheapy'.

Then Jupiter. I spent lots of time observing it at 240x and it was much clearer than with the small scope, although the seeing kept changing. As I got my eye in I started to convince myslef I could see a bit more detail than just two bands, two narrow pale bands just outside the main bands and darker beyond them, with a hint of texture in the big bands. Either I got better, the focus was better, the seeing improved or the scope cooled down a bit more  (I'd kept it in an unheated garage) and Jupiter got noticeably sharper.

I convinced myself that a small, dark dot just above the bottom band was the Red Spot.  I took a short break to check the 'net and used a few real time apps, and it seems the GRS was on the other side - what I saw was the shadow of Ganymede! Yes I did make sure used 'inverted' on teh simulator!

I would ahve tried other things, but Orion was half sunk in haze and Venus was behind a tree...

But I'm well and truly chuffed and can't wait for a truly clear night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I convinced myself that a small, dark dot just above the bottom band was the Red Spot

It very likely was the GRS, Spot yes, Great and Red questionable. :grin: :grin: :grin:

Curious what the scope was on, you say gears and polaris, and I was expecting it to be dobsonian. :confused: :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice report.

Im hoping that my next jump from 8" to a 12" I will experience the same or an even bigger wow! similar to moving from the 5" Celestron that I own. Bigger does bring with it some benefits, yet there are still some short commings to overcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the new scope feeling and you would really need a scope to see through what I have outside, maybe even the VLT would not show anything.

Sounds like you had fun and I find that many times Jupiter responds very well to a thin cloud layer, it sort of acts as a ND filter, I have often thought that I saw more with the cloud though there is of course a limit.

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a good experience ! :smiley:

The more you study the planets, the more detail you gradually see, as you have found. It's as though your eye gets "tuned in" after a while to picking out the more subtle details.

If you were observing last night the Great Red Spot was not on show as far as I know but there were transits of the shadow and disk of Jupiter's moon Callisto crossing the planets disk and both could clearly be seen with a scope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a rank beginner I have the advantage of not being aware what the limitations are ;-)

I've found this happens with other hovbbies too... fortunately in astronomy I'm less likely to break things than when I was overloading my lathe!

I certainly noticed that using the x2 barlow let me see more, where with the one for the cheap scope it made the view bigger but fuzzier. Certainly I was seeing a much clearer image than my (not very original) avatar.

Thick grey gloom again tonight. May I ask a couple of questions?

I have 10mm and 25mm eypieces and  x2 Barlow with a 1200mm x 150mm scope. I realise x300 is the theoretical limit, so I am assuming that stronger than about a 6mm or 7mm objective is pontless, or is it worth going for shorter focal lengths to make bright planet/moon images bigger if not sharper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice report

I have a Skywatcher scope that came with 10 and 25 mm EPs and x2 Barlow. I now have a couple of Celestron X-cel LX EPs 7 and 18 mm and although they don't increase magnification I can see some things more clearly. The SW 10 mm EP was not great in my view

I am relatively new to this but in my limited experience my vote would be for better quality EPs rather higher magnification

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.