Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

What can the Skywatcher Evostar ED80 do for me?


MattJenko

Recommended Posts

There are a some threads highlighting the capabilities of some of the more affordable AP setups (130PDS, RC6), so I thought I would start one for what is one of the most recommended AP startup kits: the HEQ5 mount with a Skywatcher Evostar 80ED DS-Pro. 650 Focal length, so F7.5. With the dedicated 0.85 flattener, this gives a very forgiving F6.38. It is rock solid on the HEQ5 and is a pleasure to use. It would be nice if people posted their ED80 images to show people getting into AP exactly what this humble equipment can do and just why it is such a recommended setup.

I use a modded Canon 450D, and with the considerable help and support of this forum, here are some of the images that I have obtained with this special gear in my first year of using it.

82fc42208ccdabf9c1d702f39fb34317.1824x0_

89124a137ac4f72ebfca6bc7a2f262a1.1824x0_

6639bf5572482de051c6a05d86a7e686.1824x0_

377b98eb20be85695b202f7c2af84037.1824x0_

483f2ddd3447ac259c39346604477a96.1824x0_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

great images Matt and a good thread i can join this thread as i have just got the evo 80ED.

work in progress with my little horsey.

post-12098-0-17521300-1424208471_thumb.j

not much data due to the blooming clouds only 6x900 sec HA - and 2x300 sec RGB each.

i will add more when i can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great pictures! I just bought a HEQ5 and the SW ED80 is somewhere in transit between Germany and Australia. If I ever get on this level, I would be more than pleased with myself! Great inspiration and a big boost for my impatience to finally get the scope.

Cheers

HJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some more ED80 images. These are another Skywatcher ED80 DS-Pro, but this time on an AZ-EQ GT6 mount with an unmodded Canon 60D SLR. All 4 were guided with a little ST-80 scope and a Lodestar X2 guide camera:

M45 (1.2 hours total time):

9663cf372860b1aaeab0af14db3545b7.620x0_q

M31 (2.8 hours total time):

8efd866e6af1323c3e9a75a1f74d6856.620x0_q

M42 (3.6 hours total time):

ec389ac7c3f660c10b6086450706021b.620x0_q

Rosette Nebula (3.1 hours total time):

b977e196b32d5bad66abc7a3c29a09b5.620x0_q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are excellent. You have managed to control the halos around the stars in M45 much better than I did. I wonder if that is the replacement filter in my modded Canon that caused that. It certainly is not the ED80 from your images! That Rosette is stunning, and very well processed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully there's enough contributions to rival that other thread... What was it now???.. You know.... It looks like a little bucket.... 130pdSomething.

I am not going to throw stones about the beauty of the scope. My pristiness of the lovely white scope is somewhat marred by the zip-lock bag of pennies gaffer tapped to the end of the scope to counterbalance the heavy DSLR with extra battery pack ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not going to throw stones about the beauty of the scope. My pristiness of the lovely white scope is somewhat marred by the zip-lock bag of pennies gaffer tapped to the end of the scope to counterbalance the heavy DSLR with extra battery pack ;)

Yer!

I had 2ibs of lead on the end of mine but it's a nice scope for a beginner.

Not using mine at the moment as I progressed to something faster, wider and smaller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get perfect balance can be awkward/impossible with a lot of weight hanging off the back of it. I found that when I added a guide scope, I could move the guide scope forwards and balance it that way.

It is however really light, so a weight imbalance on an HEQ5 doesn't really matter much in the greater scheme of things, or at least has not for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

??? what is the weight for ??? . we are all talking about the evo 80ED aint we.

I have a Canon 60D with the extra battery pack,so it weighs about a kilo. The dovetail that comes with the scope is quite short, so you can not move the whole assembly backwards and forewards in the mount to achieve balance as it it so camera heavy. To ensure that the whole system is balanced I needed to add a bag of pennys to the sky end of the telescope, otherwise when I release the clutch the camera descends and the whole things points straight upwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Canon 60D with the extra battery pack,so it weighs about a kilo. The dovetail that comes with the scope is quite short, so you can not move the whole assembly backwards and forewards in the mount to achieve balance as it it so camera heavy. To ensure that the whole system is balanced I needed to add a bag of pennys to the sky end of the telescope, otherwise when I release the clutch the camera descends and the whole things points straight upwards.

I use wrist/ankle training weights from Tesco - fit around the dew shield, and Velcro to a safe snug fit (as long as the scope always points upwards!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4x600 each of RGB then 4 x 30 - 60 - 90 seconds of rgb each for the core then 2 x 600 OIII - 2 x 600 HA - 2 x 600 S2 total 3 hours 24 mins then quite some time to put it all together.

post-12098-0-75162500-1424705670_thumb.j

different way of processing this time. :smiley:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi Matt

i stacked all channels as normal then i used 20 % HA and 20 % S2  added to red -------- 50 % OIII to blue --- 10 % S2 and 20 %HA to green then processed the channels individually then combined them in photoshop. did this for the core and the outer regions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because I have so much fun with this scope and I think we should keep this thread alive I will add today's effort to it. The image is IC2948 - the lambda centauri nebula. It's a faint emission nebula close to the southern cross. With an unmodded camera it required 1 hour worth of subs at ISO6400 to capture. I think this and the fact that the nebula sits right on a bright part of the milky way brings out way too many stars.

post-39098-0-87667200-1424786874_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.