Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Advice needed! Correct colours in M27??!


Recommended Posts

Hi all, 
recently posted my M27 in the photo gallery, but realized afterwards that I could get much more info out of the data. So I reprocessed it once again. 
This is just a few subs with roughly 2 and 3 mins exposure time with my 190MN on a neq6 pro. 
This time I focussed on the central regions, which were given an extra stretch and also a high pass filter. Due to my unmodded DSLR I also made the red curve a bit steeper in LAB-mode to make sure the details would be visible. ( Is this ok, or is it against astrophotography-processing-ethics?:-)) I also made the blue colours a bit more green, which I presume the 5007 Angstroms should be? ( I might be wrong..) 
Now I have to ask you; what do you think about the colours? Are they correct? Is the red a little bit to pink? ( In that case - How do you fix that? )
Any comments are much appreciated since I am a novice in processing. 
Best regards, 
Erik

M27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colour is very subjective Mr Bergman - what looks good to you, some might find too green, or blue, or pink!

Check out the one here - http://skywatcher.com/gallery.php

And Tim's et http://www.astrobin.com/37111/ - although this is very very deep!

I like yours, the colour balance looks good and the structure in the gas is nice and delicate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with processing you just go with what ever looks good to you. If you try to please everybody you will fail! I try to only emphasize colour that is already there rather than changing it, i'm currently processing M27 myself.

The background here looks good to me but i think the nebulas colour needs adjusted. I would say the centre is too green and the reds too purple, but those are only my personal colour preferences for this neb :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all, 
recently posted my M27 in the photo gallery, but realized afterwards that I could get much more info out of the data. So I reprocessed it once again. 
This is just a few subs with roughly 2 and 3 mins exposure time with my 190MN on a neq6 pro. 
This time I focussed on the central regions, which were given an extra stretch and also a high pass filter. Due to my unmodded DSLR I also made the red curve a bit steeper in LAB-mode to make sure the details would be visible. ( Is this ok, or is it against astrophotography-processing-ethics?:-)) I also made the blue colours a bit more green, which I presume the 5007 Angstroms should be? ( I might be wrong..) 
Now I have to ask you; what do you think about the colours? Are they correct? Is the red a little bit to pink? ( In that case - How do you fix that? )
Any comments are much appreciated since I am a novice in processing. 
Best regards, 
Erik

The colouring you have is typical of the unmodded DSLR. As the sensitivity to Ha is quite a lot lower ( or even none existant ) compared to blue and green combined such  result is expected. The relative lack of star colour even with the short sub lengths also confirms this. I think that you have extracted as much natural colour from the data as possible but perhaps a marginal improvement could be achieved by a different colour balance routine.

A.G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, daz, iksose7, lensman and James. Good answers from all. I know this is about taste as well, but still I want to be close to a "natural" look more than personal taste. But that seems to be hard in this case! 

As it is now, the reds are a little bit too purple. I agree! 

Daz - thanks! Had a look at others via your links. 

James - I actually made it more green, it was even more blue from the beginning! Mostly blue signal from my unmodded dslr. 

Iksose - I would really like to see your M27 when you are done processing! 

Lensman57 - yes, I will have a look at colourbalance again. 

/Erik

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.