Jim Steele Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I have been offered a manual CG5 Mount from a guy in my astronomy club in return for a small donation to the clubs funds, which seems like a steal. it has steel legs, and the tapered mount I would probably say 10-15 years old. how do these compare with an eq5? And would it handle a 4 inch refractor?Is there anything I need to look out for when looking at it and will it accept sky watcher tube rings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brantuk Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 If it were a recent one I'd say yes it will support a 4" refractor. But I've no idea about a 10-15yr old one. Do you have a picture? Just in case it's significantly different and my estimation is wrong. I've had 2 manual and 2 goto CG5's but they were all made in the last 5yrs and could be significantly different to the one you've been offered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Steele Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 Thanks Brantuk, Please see picture below, it looks solid enough. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Steele Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 Sory having issues unloading files from my phone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornelius Varley Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 It looks like the newer version of the CG5 with the improved bearings. The older version can be seen here http://www.astronomyboy.com/cg5/old_new.shtml in comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakedgun Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Depending on the donation size, of course, this could be a great acquisition. For visual usage a 4" is a good match (no f/15s) and the saddleplate will accept Celestron/Vixen-style dovetail plates. I'm sure there are still motors available for simple tracking, but I've not kept up with sources since powering mine, sorry. If you do get it, a dismantling to remove the Chinese glue they pass off as grease will make cold weather operation less frustrating.Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakedgun Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Forgot to add, you'll need to locate a counterweight for it, as none is pictured, but, you knew that already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertI Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Agree with all above comments. Looks like this is the new version with the much improved bearings. I have had both and the newer is far far better. It should cope with up to 8 kg but make sure you have a enough counterweights. It copes with my Celestron C8 fine. I would have thought a 4 inch refractor weights less than this.It takes standard vixen style dovetail which you can attach skywatcher rings to. If you do not have one something like this is a good value option: http://www.firstlightoptics.com/dovetail-bars/skywatcher-dovetail-mounting-plates.htmlYou can easily add dual axis motors with hand controller (£120) and this is fine for starting with astrophotography. I have this set up with GPUSB gizmo which allows me to control via via PC.Not sure how to spot a bad one, but the worms, gears and axes are adjustable to an extent so should be able to reduce any 'slop' or 'play' in the movements. But this is probably not an issue if you are going to use the it manually without motors. I definitely recommend taking it apart and replacing the grease as mentioned by Nakedgun. You also get to learn a lot about the internal workings of the mount!Does it have a polarscope? Could be very useful if you ever want try imaging.Hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Steele Posted April 22, 2014 Author Share Posted April 22, 2014 Forgot to add, you'll need to locate a counterweight for it, as none is pictured, but, you knew that already.Hi Nakedgun - there is a counter weight supplied. Do you know if the sky watcher motors fit the cg5? Would be nice to have a ra motor drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakedgun Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Jim,I bought the Celstron motors for mine when they were available. Others will have to comment on the applicability of the Sky Watcher unit, but it may be the same as the CG5 clone sold here in the US as the Sky View Pro from Orion. Their "True Track" system may be the same item.I tried to link Orion's page for it, but they must have some kind of block in place for all their Rubbish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakedgun Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Jim,Here is the drive unit, also sold by OPT:http://www.optcorp.com/or-7832-dual-axis-drive-for-skyview-pro-mount.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Steele Posted April 22, 2014 Author Share Posted April 22, 2014 Thanks guys, I decided to go for it! I can work out details later. A solid mount though my current scope is much too light for the counter weight - upgrade time?My wife's expression was a picture when I bought it home.It has a few faults like its missing one of the original bolts to attach tripod too the mount which has been replaced by a normal nut, and the dust cap covering where the polar scope should sit but I got a good deal so can't really complain.I just need to find a UK supplier of spare parts but still usable. Much more solid than my old mount with its 2 inch legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 ......I just need to find a UK supplier of spare parts but still usable. Much more solid than my old mount with its 2 inch legs.The Astroboot might help you. They have all sorts of bits and bobs on there:http://www.astroboot.co.uk/AstroBootI used to have a CG5 on the 2" steel tubed tripod. It was a pretty good mount and even coped with a 6" F/8 refractor for visual observing. The drive motors are very, very similar to the Skywatcher EQ5 ones which could probably be made to fit with a little ingenuity here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brantuk Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Sorry to be a bit late back to this thread. Congrats Jim - looks like a good 'un. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Steele Posted April 24, 2014 Author Share Posted April 24, 2014 No worries Brantuk, thanks for the help allJim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.