Donkeiller said:
Olly, I thought that WO were a cut above the average?
People are always raving about WO "build quality".
The focuser certainly appears well-built- steel rather than aluminium.
However I am unimpressed:mad:, I bought it to replace my Synta ED80-
which worked faultlessly...
I think the phrase, 'The famous William Optics fit and finish' comes from... William Optics. My experience of their focusers, and that recorded on the forums, is that they are frequently dire and well below the already dismal average. There was that wretched digital thing, for instance, which needed a full redesign. In general WO make their tubes too short, leaving far too much drawtube extended and leading to sag and chip misalignment.
I have a ZS66 and the focuser
just manages to hold a mid sized CCD but owners of SBIGs say it won't hold their rigs. Personally I'd like the scope to be less pretty and more functional but I don't want to knock WO too hard, they do some good stuff. Just give us a proper R and P as standard.
I think its simple: you have a smooth metal roller driving a smooth metal strip. Well what a great idea
that is!
Olly
Edited by ollypenrice, 28 December 2011 - 11:35 AM.
Run Les Granges Astronomy Holidays, teach and study imaging, SE France. 20" Dob, 10"SCT, TEC140 apo, Takahashi FSQ106. Lunt LS60 solarscope TeleVue Pronto, ZS66, 6 inch achro. Mounts, Takahashi EM200, 2 x EQ6. TeleVue Gibraltar and TelePod. CCD; Atik11000 full frame, Atik 320E, Lodestar, DMK21. Leica bins. Resident here, Yves' ODK14 on Mesu Mount 200. 4 roll offs.
www.sunstarfrance.com
Isn't it great that amateurs can get so close to the universe?