Jump to content

Welcome to Stargazers Lounge
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

EQ6Pro Belt Mod notes

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.
Here are some notes/comments regarding my own belt mod conversion. These note complement the following threads:

http://stargazerslou...dification.html

and

http://stargazerslou...belt-drive.html



  • The two part construction of the motionco 12 tooth gear means that when bored out to 5mm there is very little metal left on the inner sleeve that joins the hub to the pulley itself. Its probably worthwhile ordering a spare 12 tooth gear just in case anything goes wrong in the boring process.

  • Order spare belts – if you don't get the tension right the belts will slip and quickly the teeth will wear.

  • I lengthened the flat on the worm shaft that accepts the pulley grub screw. This gives a little more flexibility in positioning the pulley and allows you to get it away from the worm bearing.

  • Extend the slots on the motor mounting plates. On the DEC motor plate I filed back one of the motor support pillars just to get a little more play when setting the tension.

  • Position the pulley on the motor shaft so that the distance from the top of the pulley flange to the motor plate is 9mm. Note that this means the top of the motor shaft will be recessed inside the pulley.

  • With the worm carrier removed fit the motors and check the motor pulley position by looking through the slot through which the belt will pass.

  • With the motors removed, fit the worm carrier and make sure the belt has plenty of clearance passing through the mount body. I widened the casing slot slightly and rounded off all the edges - may not be necessary but I'm just cautious.

  • I used epoxy to to secure the pulley to the motor – with extra applied to the top of the flange as it isn't being held on by much metal (and I don't want it coming loose and falling into the worm compartment). I know some folks will be concerned that doing this makes the mod irreversible but even if the epoxy can subsequently be weakened by heat it really shouldn't be too hard to locate some suitable replacement 200 step bipolar stepper motors.

  • Make yourself a wire hook to help fit the belts on the motor pulleys – once you get the knack its quite easy.

  • When putting the motors in use a strongly magnetised screwdriver or a dab of grease to keep the washers in place in until you've got the bolt safely located. You can bet that if a washer does drop off it will head straight into one of the worm drives or down onto the polar scope (I had both :) before I learned my lesson!)

  • To adjust the belt tension I made up the little device shown in the accompanying attachments. It simply sits on the top corner of the motor and the set screw is tightened against the casing side wall using an allen key. This pushes the motor inwards tensioning the belt. When your happy you just tighten the mounting plate bolts and slacken set screw to remove the tensioner – patent pending, every belt kit should have one!:)

  • Run the motors at a fast speed for a few minutes then check inside the motor housing for any signs of belt dust – if there is remove the motors and inspect the belts (you might as well remove the DEC axis totally as you'll find it hard get the belts back on otherwise.

The belt mod is rather fiddly. The belts are not easily accessible and its hard to monitor what is going on with them once the mount is reassembled. Changing the belts will require complete disassembly. Be prepared to disassemble the DEC axis if you remove the motors – it hard to get the belts back on with the DEC axis in place. Should I ever have the mount in pieces again I may well drill and taping some holes in the rear of the motor housing to make the process of belt engagement and inspection easier.

I would recommend limit protection to be enabled as there is the possibility that the belt might start to slip with resultant damage to the belt teeth if movement is obstructed. Although the belts are cheap the hassle involved in belt replacement (particularly RA axis) means you really want to take all steps to avoid this if possible. Cable snags also present a situation where damage to the belt might occur.

All in all I'm happy with my belt mod. The only real concern in recommending the belt mod to others is the marginal nature of the machining required on those 12 tooth pulleys. An alternative solution worth of consideration would be to source a pair of 0.9 degree/step bipolar stepper motors and fit 24 tooth motionco pulleys instead (these are of a solid construction).

Chris.

Attached Thumbnails

  • tensioner1.jpg
  • tensioner2.jpg


#2
malc-c

malc-c

    Red Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 4,827 posts
  • Location: Hertfordshire
Chris,

Nice write up. I agree 100% about the small motor pulley not having much meat left on it when bored out. At least on the HEQ5 both the motors and the drive axis are exposed once the cover is off , allowing quick replacement of the belts and or pulleys should they need it.

On the subject of belts, Belingonline supply 80t, 82t, 85t, 87t, 88t and 90t which should allow for adequate tension. I have a couple of 82t belts on order which I'm hoping will fit the bill on the HEQ5... I'll up date my thread later after they've been delivered.
Regards

Malcolm

Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro Goto + Skywatcher 200P OTA
Skywatcher ST80 Guidescope
Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Goto - Celestron 127 Mak OTA
QH5Y Guide Camera, Canon 400D, Several Modded SPC880 Webcam, NexImage Webcam.

Housed in ROR observatory http://stargazerslou...d-underway.html
Blog and my hobby website http://micro-heli.co.uk/

#3
malc-c

malc-c

    Red Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 4,827 posts
  • Location: Hertfordshire

An alternative solution worth of consideration would be to source a pair of 0.9 degree/step bipolar stepper motors and fit 24 tooth motionco pulleys instead (these are of a solid construction).

Chris.


Chris,

Googling "0.9 degree/step bipolar stepper motors" resulted in loads of hits, and varying prices :)

Is is there any other info on the specification for the existing motors around ?
Regards

Malcolm

Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro Goto + Skywatcher 200P OTA
Skywatcher ST80 Guidescope
Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Goto - Celestron 127 Mak OTA
QH5Y Guide Camera, Canon 400D, Several Modded SPC880 Webcam, NexImage Webcam.

Housed in ROR observatory http://stargazerslou...d-underway.html
Blog and my hobby website http://micro-heli.co.uk/

#4
George

George

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 3,735 posts
  • Location: Stockport UK
Great writeup Chris :)

All in all I'm happy with my belt mod. The only real concern in recommending the belt mod to others is the marginal nature of the machining required on those 12 tooth pulleys. An alternative solution worth of consideration would be to source a pair of 0.9 degree/step bipolar stepper motors and fit 24 tooth motionco pulleys instead (these are of a solid construction).
Chris.


Im just waiting on some pricing on all steel 12 tooth pulleys ready bored out to 5mm, problem is minimum order of 50 for these custom made.
Ive bought myself a small lathe and Im toying with the idea of offering everything needed in a ready to fit kit if I can get the minimum of 24 forward orders to make it worthwhile getting the custom 12 tooth gears made.

Edited by George, 12 December 2011 - 09:23 PM.

George

SW 250PX & SW ED80

Belt converted EQ6 + EQmod
Modified Canon 350 & 1000D
QHY8
ST80 & QHY5 Guider

Stockport UK

#5
malc-c

malc-c

    Red Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 4,827 posts
  • Location: Hertfordshire

Great writeup Chris :)



Im just waiting on some pricing on all steel 12 tooth pulleys ready bored out to 5mm, problem is minimum order of 50 for these custom made.
Ive bought myself a small lathe and Im toying with the idea of offering everything needed in a ready to fit kit if I can get the minimum of 24 forward orders to make it worthwhile getting the custom 12 tooth gears made.


PM sent :)
Regards

Malcolm

Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro Goto + Skywatcher 200P OTA
Skywatcher ST80 Guidescope
Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Goto - Celestron 127 Mak OTA
QH5Y Guide Camera, Canon 400D, Several Modded SPC880 Webcam, NexImage Webcam.

Housed in ROR observatory http://stargazerslou...d-underway.html
Blog and my hobby website http://micro-heli.co.uk/

#6
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.
Attached are my initial PE recordings for the belt drive.

As you can see from the frequency spectrum there are only really two signals present (worm/worm pulley and stepper pulleys) and the response is nicely repeatable. There is no evidence of any 10S jitter from the belt meshing which is rather pleasing because with gears I always used to have a 10s gear mesh signal present. The overall Peak to Peak amplitude is very similar to what I used to get prior to the belt mod so I assume that the worm is generating the majority of this rather than the pulley drive itself. Perhaps with a bit more tweaking tweaking this can be reduced a bit more (I may try swapping the worms next time I have the mount in bits)

I've still to do a logged run with PEC active but this signal should correct nicely.

Chris.

Attached Thumbnails

  • PPBeltmod1.png
  • PPBeltmod2.png


#7
MG1

MG1

    Sub Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,217 posts
  • Location: Brizzel, UK
That a really nice repeatable wave there!
Should correct well I'm guessing!
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" - Mark Twain

#8
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.

Chris,

Googling "0.9 degree/step bipolar stepper motors" resulted in loads of hits, and varying prices :)

Is is there any other info on the specification for the existing motors around ?


Hi Malcolm,

Sorry I haven't researched it yet at all, it was just something that occurred to me whilst I was writing the post above.

I know they will be 12V and bipolar but I'll have to measure the resistance of the coils of the current motors and the dimensions.

I expect 0.9 degree/step will be quite expensive but in themselves they offer a performance upgrade - more torque and smoother microstepping. Being able to fit a larger radius gear on the stepper end with double the number of teeth gripping the belt must also make for a more robust drive.

Chris.

#9
malc-c

malc-c

    Red Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 4,827 posts
  • Location: Hertfordshire

Hi Malcolm,

Sorry I haven't researched it yet at all, it was just something that occurred to me whilst I was writing the post above.

I know they will be 12V and bipolar but I'll have to measure the resistance of the coils of the current motors and the dimensions.

I expect 0.9 degree/step will be quite expensive but in themselves they offer a performance upgrade - more torque and smoother microstepping. Being able to fit a larger radius gear on the stepper end with double the number of teeth gripping the belt must also make for a more robust drive.

Chris.


Sounds like the ideal upgrade..I guess you would ideally match the current motors rather than those with more torque as I would assume there is a risk to the controller board if a high torque motor dew too much current from the controller ?
Regards

Malcolm

Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro Goto + Skywatcher 200P OTA
Skywatcher ST80 Guidescope
Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Goto - Celestron 127 Mak OTA
QH5Y Guide Camera, Canon 400D, Several Modded SPC880 Webcam, NexImage Webcam.

Housed in ROR observatory http://stargazerslou...d-underway.html
Blog and my hobby website http://micro-heli.co.uk/

#10
Psychobilly

Psychobilly

    Supernova

  • Global Mods
  • 28,896 posts
  • Location: Blue Green Planet , Orbiting a G2V Star, The Orion Spur, Milky Way.... Some Like To Call Home.. :)
Thanks for the info and all those involved in the original threads...

Generally the NEMA Frame size is the Edge length in 1/10" ... 23 and 24 are both the same...

NEMA 8 0.8" square
NEMA 11 1.1" square
NEMA 14 1.4" square
NEMA 15 1.5" square
NEMA 17 1.7" square
NEMA 23 2.3" square
NEMA 24 2.3" square
NEMA 34 3.4" square
NEMA 43 4.2" square


I may have a go at the HEQ-5 Syntrek sometime after all it only cost me a Fiver ....

Peter...

Edited by Psychobilly, 13 December 2011 - 08:00 AM.

We choose to image with DSLR’s. We choose to image with DSLR’s in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

 

 

Canon 5D Mk III , 7D , 1000D (Baader BCF), 350D (Full Spectrum)  and some Nice Glass from 10 to 600mm ....  Nikon D200 & D50


#11
MG1

MG1

    Sub Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,217 posts
  • Location: Brizzel, UK
For those following the thread who like me have/had no idea what frame size means, here's some reading: http://www.motorsand...otorterms2.html

Every day's a school day on SGL!
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" - Mark Twain

#12
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.

I know they will be 12V and bipolar but I'll have to measure the resistance of the coils of the current motors and the dimensions.


Scrub that comment about being 12V -I just noticed the driver chips have their own switched mode power supply - so I need to check. There is a guy on the EQ6 Y! group who has already fitted 0.9 degree motors in a 3:1 belt mode (giving effectively 6:1 over the original design). I'll ask him.

Chris.

#13
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.

Sounds like the ideal upgrade..I guess you would ideally match the current motors rather than those with more torque as I would assume there is a risk to the controller board if a high torque motor dew too much current from the controller ?


You'd match with the current motor spec for coil resistance, voltage and dimension. The torque is a function of motor design but if all else is equal (including torque itself) having a half the step angle means that the maximum torque will be applied every 0.9 degrees of ration instead of every 1.8 degrees.

Don't get your hopes up though - I really don't know if appropriate motors are available!

Chris.

#14
MG1

MG1

    Sub Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,217 posts
  • Location: Brizzel, UK
Out of interest would this require a custom ASCOM diver? I know that EQmod has the facility to input custom profiles, but what about other software...Stellarium, CdC, phd?

Or would the idea be that the pulley ratios be such that the actual output resolution is the same?

Would this effectively stretch the PE graph? Or since the main contributor is the worm, have little real effect?
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" - Mark Twain

#15
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.

Out of interest would this require a custom ASCOM diver? I know that EQmod has the facility to input custom profiles, but what about other software...Stellarium, CdC, phd?

Or would the idea be that the pulley ratios be such that the actual output resolution is the same?

Would this effectively stretch the PE graph? Or since the main contributor is the worm, have little real effect?


EQMOD is the custom ASCOM driver. At the ASCOM levels there are no, steppers, microsteps, worms or pulleys - it operates at a much higher level. So gotos and position reads are in terms of RA, DEC, Alt, AZ. ASCOM Pulse guiding simply works by specifying a direction (N, S, E, W-) and a duration. It is the driver that maps all this to whatever hardware is present.

The PE graph is not streatched in any way. We still have to track at sidereal! The rotation period of the worm therefore does not change at all wen performing these belt mods - yes the gearing in the worm drive changes if you go to a 4:1 belt mode but the driver compensates according by instructing the mount controller to step a little faster than it would normally do.

Chris.

#16
Reggie

Reggie

    Sub Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,159 posts

Scrub that comment about being 12V -I just noticed the driver chips have their own switched mode power supply - so I need to check. There is a guy on the EQ6 Y! group who has already fitted 0.9 degree motors in a 3:1 belt mode (giving effectively 6:1 over the original design). I'll ask him.

Chris.

Any idea what the motor driver chips are Chris? They might well be running at 12v with a motor that is specced as an example to 6v, it's perfectly acceptable to do this if you current limit the power getting to the motor in some way depending on the driver, for instance, the easy driver stepper driver board for the SGL observatory automation focuser has it's own current limit adjustment pot which is a function of the 'chopper' motor driver IC, just make sure that you are supplying the correct current and as much or more voltage than you need and everything is fine. All that happens is you increase the speed that the coils energise.

If anyone has their mount apart with the motor driver board out, I'd be most grateful if someone could take some hi-res images of the front and back of the board.

Edited by Reggie, 13 December 2011 - 02:39 PM.


#17
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.

Any idea what the motor driver chips are Chris?.


For each axis the board provides microstepping via two A3959 Full bridge PWM motor driver chips.

Chris.

#18
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.
Had this response back from Jeff Machesky on the EQ6 Y! group

The stepper motors I'm using are 17Y9304S-LW4 from Anaheim Automation. I had to special order them at the time, but they might have them in stock now. They were a bit pricey compared to 1.8 deg/step motors, but not too bad. Very good quality motors. I did end up reducing the resistance on the current sense resistors a little bit to get the little extra current these want. They worked without that mod, but didn't have the full torque. Simple mod however. The IC's still run fairly cool.

17Y9 - High Torque Stepper Motor

Chris.

#19
Reggie

Reggie

    Sub Dwarf

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,159 posts
The stepper is a 2.8v 1.19a per coil, unless there is a 3a or bigger v-reg set lower than 12v in there then it seems to suggest that it's being run at > 2.8v (the rating for the stepper) I could be wrong. Getting the current correct as he has done is key for getting the torque and speed consistent with the ratings of the stepper.

Those are beefy little chips 3amp 50v max output I believe, I just wonder why they went for 2 seperate ones instead of one of the integrated stepper chopper driver chips that allegro do? I wonder if IC temperature was a consideration or cost. I wonder if the design has changed at all over the years?

Edited by Reggie, 13 December 2011 - 04:27 PM.


#20
chrisshillito

chrisshillito

    Dark Matter

  • Advanced Members
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location: Bucks.
A LT1170 switching regulator provides the load supply to the A3959s.

I would imagine cost is the driving factor for the design. As I understand it each PWM drives a separate coil. The PWM drivers are out of phase so as the current to one motor coil increases the current to the other coil decreases thereby implementing the microstepping.

Chris.

Edited by chrisshillito, 13 December 2011 - 05:40 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users