| DIY Observatories A locked area for step by step guides to building your own observatory. |
 To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Sub Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 1,016
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
|
|
To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 01:23 PM
Having just got my nice new pier  back from the welders I do have a question for you pier experts out there: Is it worth filling the pier with anything?
I have looked around the net and found sites that range from the "use sand" type to the "the physics of high and low frequency vibration damping in telescope piers" kind!!
I'm confuddled!!
P.S. My pier is 5.5" steel tube 1m long and the whole thing, including the bracing, weighs in at 90lbs. If you want a pic please see my Blog in my signature.
Thanks in advance.
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Moderator
White Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 3,230
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 01:40 PM
My pier is filled a little more than halfway with a sludgy mix of sand and engine oil. There is absolutely no vibration, ringing, resonance or similar of any sort.
If you do this though, make sure you dry the sand out thoroughly first though, as the oil will displace any water over time (as I found out!)
The reason its not filled the whole way is to keep the centre of gravity low. The oil has the added benefit of stopping any corrosion on the inside of the pier.
Cheers
Rob
TMB 152, WO ZS80FD, TAL 100R, Helios ST120, 12 inch Lightbridge Dob.
Astrophysics AP1200 GTO, Atik 16HR and loads of bits and bobs and a dog called Nelson
Website. www.middlehillobservatory.co.uk
Last edited by RobH; 23rd January 2010 at 01:40 PM.
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
|
Proto Star
|
|
Posts: 893
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 02:04 PM
I have an eight inch diameter five foot pier made from steel with an 8mm or so wall thickness. It does ping very slightly if I whack it but I have never seen any kind of vibration in use. It is filled with fresh air. I did contemplate doing what Rob described above but it is already about 200lb in weight and I didn't want to add to that.
Dennis
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Super Moderator
White Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 3,572
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 02:08 PM
I put play sand in mine, just to stop the ringing.
Helen
C8 with Hyperstar, ZS66, Megrez 90, PST and C11 , EQ6 with EQMod, SE mount
SVXH9 mono, QHY8Pro, ATiK 16ic, DMK21, Watec
(and a load of bits which need sorting out!)
all in a roll-off roof observatory
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Brown Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 2,093
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 02:25 PM
I would definately recommend filling it with dampening material - sand or similar material.
Pete
Meade 10" SNT :GSO 8" F4 Newt: SW 120ED PRO : WO Megrez 72FD Vixen Sphinx and Atlux mounts
Atik 383L+ CCD, Canon 1000D modded, QHY5, MPCC, WO FF III, SW FF
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
White Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 3,215
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 03:36 PM
I like Rob's idea of oil/ sand mix.
Aussie Exile in Cobham.
" Very funny, Scotty..... now beam down our clothes"
12" LX200, C9.25s, 4" Genesis, NEQ6pro, QHY5, DMK21AF04, MX916, 300D modded, SolarMax SM60DS/BF15, UBVRI filters, Star Analyser, Baader, Spectra-L200 and other Spectroscope(s).
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" -Springer 2010
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Moderator
Brown Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 2,568
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 03:57 PM
Just dry sand for mine.
Mike.
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Super Moderator
Main Sequence
|
|
Posts: 5,274
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 03:57 PM
If you pop to a local builders merchants, or even B&Q, grab a bag of kiln dried sand. making sure there are no rips or tears in the bag. A bag of normal sand can contain a jugful of water.
I havent filled mine as yet, but plan to use at least oil to help fight corrosion, probably in the sand as above.
...trying to fill the unforgiving minute with sixty seconds' worth of distance run......
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
|
Red Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 4,436
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 05:01 PM
Same here, plan to fill mine (like Robs idea too)... about half way
We did something similar with speaker stands in work... (holding Genelec 1034's)
C11 (Lunar and planetary high res), TMB 105 F6.2 /ST102 (parallel deep sky imaging rig) , Vixen A80 MF (PST mod H-A front end), Atik 314L (Primary DSO cam), DSI-C (guider), Lumenera Skynyx 2-0 m (Solar and Planetary cam), EQ6 Pro mount (general dogsbody), Modded EOS (wide field and wide Deep Sky), pair of netbooks, lots of software and an observatory.
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Super Moderator
Sub Giant
|
|
Posts: 9,087
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 05:05 PM
I have an aluminium pier and my guiding is suggesting some rapid vibrations which I can't feel by touching the mount but it's there alright. Doesn't seem to effect the results. I'm going to use a sand and oil mix and see if that puts a stop to it. If you haven't got any evidence of vibration then it would seem sensible not to do anything!
Martin
Ryehill Observatory and a lawn
Skyliner 300, 10" LX200ACF, 8" F4 GSO newt, ED120, Tak FSQ 106, ZS66.
Tak EM200, Vixen Super Polaris
QHY8, QSI 532ws
Lots of wires
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Sub Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 1,016
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 05:29 PM
It looks as if sand is a favourite! I must admit I'm not too keen on adding oil, simply on the grounds of mess if I should ever want to move the darn thing!
I reckoned on painting the insides by swilling some diluted hammerite around in it and then draining the excess - that should help the corrosion problem.
Thank you all for the tips - anyone else????? - keep 'em coming!!!!!!
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Moderator
White Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 3,230
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 06:55 PM
What the oil does is keep the sandy mix in really close contact with the pier at all points.
Sand will work of course but I tend to be 'belt and braces' with this sort of thing, and you'll only really find out if you have any vibration issues after you've invested a lot of time in getting a really good polar alignment and been using the rig for a while, at which point you'll have to then upset everything if you find there's a problem.
If I have to move, a bit more mess while dismantling the observatory won't make much difference
Cheers
Rob
TMB 152, WO ZS80FD, TAL 100R, Helios ST120, 12 inch Lightbridge Dob.
Astrophysics AP1200 GTO, Atik 16HR and loads of bits and bobs and a dog called Nelson
Website. www.middlehillobservatory.co.uk
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
 |
Super Moderator
Main Sequence
|
|
Posts: 5,274
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 07:40 PM
A good layer of grease around the welds especially would do the trick too, but maybe access is tricky?
Due to the way in which hammerite works, I'd be surprised if a diluted solution of it would do very much. Although I have used hammerite for many garden jobs with no problems, the guys I know who are fabricators reckon it to be rubbish and say you might just as well use the normal metal paint from B&Q.
I suppose to ease the (potential future) mess you could fill the bottom and then cap off the sand and oil with an expanding polyurethane foam over a cardboard layer.
...trying to fill the unforgiving minute with sixty seconds' worth of distance run......
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
|
Proto Star
|
|
Posts: 585
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
23rd January 2010, 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizibilder
It looks as if sand is a favourite! I must admit I'm not too keen on adding oil, simply on the grounds of mess if I should ever want to move the darn thing!
Thank you all for the tips - anyone else????? - keep 'em coming!!!!!!
|
MESS  I swabbed the inside of my pier with greese before filling it 2/3rds with brichbats and concrete, now that was messy. No ringing now, solid as a rock. I dare not think about removig the pier as it is set in half a ton of concrete
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
|
Proto Star
|
|
Posts: 893
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
24th January 2010, 10:27 AM
TJ mentioned using poly foam. Why have I never heard of that before, it would seem to be the perfect solution.
Dennis
|
 |
 Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... |
|
|
|
Red Dwarf
|
|
Posts: 4,436
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
|
|
Re: To fill or not to fill? The pier that is... -
26th January 2010, 01:24 PM
a great thread this...thanks guys!
C11 (Lunar and planetary high res), TMB 105 F6.2 /ST102 (parallel deep sky imaging rig) , Vixen A80 MF (PST mod H-A front end), Atik 314L (Primary DSO cam), DSI-C (guider), Lumenera Skynyx 2-0 m (Solar and Planetary cam), EQ6 Pro mount (general dogsbody), Modded EOS (wide field and wide Deep Sky), pair of netbooks, lots of software and an observatory.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|